Translate
Resources
Diagnostic Tool for Assessing Transboundary Conservation Feasibility
| Author: | Vasilijević, M., Zunckel, K., Shadie, P., Erg, B. |
| Language: | |
| Topic: | Conservation |
| Type: | Tools |
| Last updated: | 18 February 2026 |
This document provides comprehensive guidance on the Diagnostic Tool for Assessing Transboundary Conservation Feasibility (Version 2.1), developed by IUCN WCPA and collaborators.
The Xcel version with macros can be sourced from Kevan Zunkel at kevanzunckel@gmail.com .
This document provides comprehensive guidance on the Diagnostic Tool for Assessing Transboundary Conservation Feasibility (Version 2.1), developed by IUCN WCPA and collaborators. Below are the key points:
Acknowledgments
The tool is based on years of feedback and practical experience from practitioners, government agencies, managers, civil society organizations, and community representatives.
Peer reviewers and contributors, including Sunita Chaudhary, Olivier Chassot, Jamie McCallum, and Antonio Vasilijević, improved the tool's clarity and technical solutions.
Introduction
Transboundary Conservation: Defined by IUCN as cooperation across international boundaries to achieve conservation goals.
Types of TBCAs:
Transboundary Protected Area
Transboundary Conservation Landscape/Seascape
Transboundary Migration Conservation Area
Special designation: Park for Peace.
Benefits: Ecological, socio-economic, cultural, and political advantages, contributing to global biodiversity targets like the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.
Challenges: Complexities in communication, governance, and stakeholder engagement.
Diagnostic Tool
Purpose: Rapid assessment of transboundary conservation feasibility, stakeholder engagement, and strategy design.
Target Audience: Protected area managers, government officials, civil society organizations, policymakers, Indigenous Peoples, scientists, and others involved in transboundary conservation.
Structure: Includes instructions, glossary, questionnaire (Parts A-E), automated report, feasibility status, and annex.
Questionnaire: Divided into six parts:
Part A: Background and context
Part B: Site values and threats
Part C: Economy
Part D: Socio-cultural dynamics
Part E: Governance and management framework
Types of Questions: Quantitative (scored) and qualitative (descriptive).
Implementation Approaches
Transboundary participatory workshops: Involves stakeholders from all countries for joint completion of the questionnaire.
National workshops: Stakeholders complete the questionnaire separately, and results are compiled later.
Individual self-assessment: Cost-effective but less comprehensive.
Automated Assessment Report
Summarizes key aspects of transboundary conservation feasibility, including ecological reasons, benefits, challenges, stakeholder roles, and capacity for cooperation.
Provides a visual summary using a traffic-light system for easy understanding.
Historical Development
First published in 2012, with updates in 2020 and 2026 based on feedback and collaboration with various organizations.
Key Objectives
Evaluate feasibility by identifying priorities, differences, and opportunities.
Guide design and implementation of initiatives.
Improve ongoing initiatives.
Strengthen stakeholder awareness and capacity.
Enable rapid participatory assessments.
Provide self-assessment of feasibility.
Annex
Lists potential benefits, required actions, and challenges across areas like legal frameworks, ecosystem management, socio-economics, cultural linkages, regional integration, management, law enforcement, research, and knowledge sharing.
Feedback
The tool is dynamic and open to updates based on user feedback. Contact Maja Vasilijević for comments or suggestions.
This document serves as a detailed manual for practitioners and stakeholders involved in transboundary conservation initiatives, offering structured guidance for assessing feasibility and fostering collaboration across international boundaries.










